Comparing OpenAI's o1 Mini and o1 Preview: A Deep Dive

💡Want to use GPT-o1 Models now without restrictions, or wait time? Don't want to pay $2k per month for ChatGPT Plus for accessing Strawberry models? (Supposely) Use Anakin AI! Anakin AI is your all-in-one platform for all your Generative AI modles, use GPT-o1, GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Google Gemini,

1000+ Pre-built AI Apps for Any Use Case

Comparing OpenAI's o1 Mini and o1 Preview: A Deep Dive

Start for free
Contents
💡
Want to use GPT-o1 Models now without restrictions, or wait time?

Don't want to pay $2k per month for ChatGPT Plus for accessing Strawberry models? (Supposely)

Use Anakin AI! Anakin AI is your all-in-one platform for all your Generative AI modles, use GPT-o1, GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Google Gemini, Llama 3.5 405B, Uncensored LLM, FLUX, DALLE 3... Everything in one place!
Anakin.ai - One-Stop AI App Platform
Generate Content, Images, Videos, and Voice; Craft Automated Workflows, Custom AI Apps, and Intelligent Agents. Your exclusive AI app customization workstation.

The AI landscape has been revolutionized with OpenAI's latest offerings: o1 Mini and o1 Preview. Released on September 14, 2024, these models have quickly become the subject of intense discussion in tech circles. This article aims to provide a comprehensive comparison of these two cutting-edge AI models, focusing on their capabilities, performance metrics, and potential applications.

OpenAI o1-Preview vs o1 mini: Key Similarities and Differences

Common Ground

Both o1 Mini and o1 Preview share several fundamental characteristics:

  • Context Window: Both models boast an impressive 128K token input context window.
  • Knowledge Cutoff: Information up to October 2023 forms their knowledge base.
  • Provider: OpenAI is behind both models.

Diverging Paths

Despite these similarities, the models have distinct features that set them apart:

  • Output Capacity: o1 Mini can generate up to 65.5K tokens per request, while o1 Preview is capped at 32.8K tokens.
  • Pricing Structure: o1 Mini is significantly more cost-effective, with input and output costs at $3.00 and $12.00 per million tokens respectively. o1 Preview, on the other hand, charges $15.00 for input and $60.00 for output per million tokens.

o1-Preview vs o1 mini: Performance Benchmarks

Mathematical Prowess

In the American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME):

  • o1 Mini achieved a remarkable 70.0% score.
  • o1 Preview scored 44.6%.

This places o1 Mini's mathematical abilities on par with the top 500 high school students in the United States.

Coding Capabilities

On the Codeforces platform:

  • o1 Mini reached an Elo rating of 1650.
  • o1 Preview attained an Elo of 1258.

o1 Mini's score puts it in the 86th percentile of Codeforces competitors, showcasing its exceptional coding abilities.

Scientific Reasoning

In scientific reasoning tasks:

  • o1 Mini outperformed GPT-4o on the GPQA (science) benchmark.
  • o1 Mini also surpassed GPT-4o on the MATH-500 test.

However, it's worth noting that o1 Mini's performance on GPQA lags behind o1 Preview due to its more specialized knowledge base.

Human Preference Evaluation

When compared to GPT-4o on complex, open-ended prompts:

  • o1 Mini was preferred in reasoning-intensive domains.
  • o1 Preview was favored in language-focused areas.

o1-Preview vs o1 mini: Speed and Efficiency

One of o1 Mini's standout features is its processing speed:

  • o1 Mini operates 3-5 times faster than GPT-4o.
  • o1 Preview, while faster than GPT-4o, doesn't match o1 Mini's speed.

This speed advantage makes o1 Mini particularly attractive for applications requiring rapid response times or processing large data volumes.

o1 vs o1 mini: Specialized Capabilities

o1 Mini: The STEM Specialist

o1 Mini has been optimized for STEM reasoning during its pretraining phase, resulting in exceptional performance in:

  • Advanced mathematics
  • Complex coding tasks
  • Scientific problem-solving

However, this specialization comes at the cost of broader knowledge. In non-STEM areas like historical dates, biographies, and general trivia, o1 Mini performs similarly to smaller language models such as GPT-4o mini.

o1 Preview: The Generalist

While o1 Preview doesn't match o1 Mini's STEM performance, it offers a more balanced skill set, excelling in:

  • General knowledge tasks
  • Nuanced language understanding
  • Broad reasoning across diverse domains

o1-Preview vs o1 mini: Safety and Robustness

Both models incorporate OpenAI's alignment and safety techniques, but o1 Mini shows some advantages:

  • 59% higher jailbreak robustness on an internal version of the StrongREJECT dataset compared to GPT-4o.
  • Underwent the same rigorous safety evaluations and external red-teaming as o1 Preview.

This enhanced safety profile makes o1 Mini a compelling choice for applications where security and adherence to guidelines are paramount.

o1-Preview1 vs o1 mini: Use Cases and Applications

o1 Mini

  1. STEM Education: Ideal for creating problem sets, explaining complex concepts, and assisting with homework in mathematics, physics, and other STEM fields.
  2. Advanced Coding: Excellent for code generation, debugging, and explaining intricate programming concepts across various languages.
  3. Scientific Research: Can assist in data analysis, hypothesis generation, and literature review in STEM fields.
  4. Rapid Prototyping: Its speed makes it suitable for quick iterations in software development and engineering design.
  5. Automated Reasoning: Useful in applications requiring fast, logical decision-making based on structured data.

o1 Preview

  1. Content Creation: Better suited for generating diverse content across various topics due to its broader knowledge base.
  2. Language Translation: More adept at nuanced translations and understanding context in multiple languages.
  3. Customer Service: Can handle a wider range of customer inquiries across different industries.
  4. Market Analysis: Better equipped to process and analyze diverse market trends and consumer behaviors.
  5. General Research: More effective for interdisciplinary research that spans beyond STEM fields.

o1-Preview vs o1 mini: Cost Considerations

The pricing structure of these models significantly impacts their adoption:

  • o1 Mini is approximately 80% cheaper than o1 Preview.
  • This cost efficiency makes o1 Mini attractive for large-scale applications, especially in STEM fields.

For organizations primarily focused on STEM applications, o1 Mini offers a significant cost advantage without compromising on performance in these areas.

o1 vs o1 mini: Limitations and Future Developments

o1 Mini

  • Limited knowledge in non-STEM areas
  • May struggle with tasks requiring broad cultural or historical context

OpenAI has indicated plans to address these limitations in future versions, potentially expanding o1 Mini's capabilities to other modalities and specialties outside of STEM.

o1 Preview

  • Higher cost may limit its use in some applications
  • Slower processing speed compared to o1 Mini

Future updates may focus on improving processing speed and efficiency to make o1 Preview more competitive in areas where o1 Mini currently excels.

o1-Preview vs o1 mini: Integration and Accessibility

Both models are available through OpenAI's API, with some differences in access:

  • Available in ChatGPT Plus (including Team and Enterprise users)
  • API access for developers on tier 5 of API usage
  • In ChatGPT, o1 Preview has a limit of 30 messages per week
  • o1 Mini has a higher limit of 50 messages per week

After reaching these limits, users are required to switch to GPT-4o models.

Conclusion

The introduction of o1 Mini and o1 Preview marks a significant milestone in AI development. o1 Mini stands out for its exceptional STEM performance, cost-efficiency, and speed, making it an ideal choice for organizations focused on these areas. Its specialized capabilities in mathematics and coding set a new standard in AI-assisted problem-solving.

o1 Preview, while more expensive, offers a balanced approach with broader capabilities, making it suitable for a wide range of applications requiring diverse knowledge and skills.

The choice between these models ultimately depends on specific user or organizational needs. For STEM-focused applications prioritizing cost-efficiency and speed, o1 Mini is the clear winner. For more general-purpose applications requiring broad knowledge and versatility, o1 Preview may be the better choice despite its higher cost.

As OpenAI continues to refine these models, we can expect further advancements in both specialized and general capabilities. The AI community eagerly anticipates future developments that may bridge the gap between specialized and general-purpose models, potentially revolutionizing problem-solving and decision-making across various fields.

💡
Want to use GPT-o1 Models now without restrictions, or wait time?

Don't want to pay $2k per month for ChatGPT Plus for accessing Strawberry models? (Supposely)

Use Anakin AI! Anakin AI is your all-in-one platform for all your Generative AI modles, use GPT-o1, GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Google Gemini, Llama 3.5 405B, Uncensored LLM, FLUX, DALLE 3... Everything in one place!
Anakin.ai - One-Stop AI App Platform
Generate Content, Images, Videos, and Voice; Craft Automated Workflows, Custom AI Apps, and Intelligent Agents. Your exclusive AI app customization workstation.